The Fabulous Fifties:
"This man has been standing alone against us. It's not easy to stand
alone against the ridicule of others. So he gambled for support - and I
gave it to him"
Review: 12 Angry Men
An Augustus Review of 8.5/10
For the Fabulous
Fifties week, I will review the movie 12
Angry Men, where twelve jurors have to decide the fate of a young boy but
only one believes his innocence.
The movie begins with the trial of a young Puerto Rican boy
who was accused of knifing his father to death. The twelve jurors listening to
the case are all men from different backgrounds and different life styles. The
trial ends and the men retire to the jury room where they have to come up with
a decision. If the boy is proven innocent without a reasonable doubt, he will
be free. If not, the jurors will have condemned the boy to death.
As soon as the men meet in the room, they quickly glance
over the evidence. They shortly discuss the trial and decide to have a vote.
Eleven men voted the boy guilty. They turn to the last man, Juror #8 (Henry
Fonda), and look at him surprisingly. They ask him what is he waiting for and
to raise his hand. The juror looks back at the men and responds. The boy is not
guilty.
The juror explains that to him, the evidence doesn’t make
sense. He thinks that they should all go over the entire trial and carefully
form a verdict. They are playing with a boy’s life, they can’t rush the
details. His vote angers the other jurors especially Juror #10 and Juror #7 whom
both believe the discussion is a waste of time.
The men begin to look over the evidence again and many
become frustrated. After each piece of evidence is looked over, they have
another vote. Slowly, some jurors begin to see the boy’s innocence and vote
that he is not guilty. Some of the jurors, like Juror #10, can’t get over past
prejudices to realistically consider that he is innocent.
As the deliberation continues, the men are having even more
difficulty coming to a unanimous vote. More and more of the jurors are switching
opinions. The few men who are left undecided hold the most difficult answer:
guilty or not guilty?
12 Angry Men is an
excellent movie in two regards: developing plot and developing characters. The
entire movie focuses on the evidence given in thorough detail. The explanations
given by the jurors are realistic and make a lot of sense.
This movie is regarded as a classic. It has been given many
titles such as 42nd most inspiring film, 87th best film
in 100 years and Juror #8 was 28th in the 50 best heroes of the 20th
century. The movie has received 100% positive votes on Rotten Tomatoes.
Overall, this movie is very inspiring and thought-provoking.
If you enjoy courtroom dramas or thorough explanation of scenes in a movie, 12 Angry Men is definitely the movie to
watch!
- Augustus

I saw a play version of this, and it was stellar. I agree the character development is really good, and the characters are believable.
ReplyDeleteThey fill the movie with a plot with lots of depth too, considering it basically takes place in just one setting.
Yep, I love this one. I watched it in law last year. A great plot indeed.
DeleteI grew up with this movie. I could it over and over, never getting sick of it. Love when he goes out and buys the switchblade on the street, and the way that the one juror has tickets to a game so he wants to just kill the boy and get it over with. this movie is a masterpiece, so glad you're doing a fifties week.
ReplyDeleteThis is such a great movie. I'm pretty sure the only other movie I remember ever having gotten 100% on rotten tomatoes is Toy Story.
ReplyDelete